The Divine Liturgy and Our Worship of God — 20160313

Mystical Supper

Mystical Supper

I shared in the last issue that the sacramental act of anamnesis draws the Church into a transformative encounter with the risen Christ in the present. This occurs within the context of retrospection and anticipation. On the one hand, successive Eucharists connect the Church to Christ’s life, death and resurrection, the culmination of God’s saving acts in history focused on the Last Supper. On the other hand, through participation in the Eucharist the Church is called into the mission of God – building His Kingdom – which comes to fulfillment at the eschaton (i.e., the end time). Anamnesis has the capacity to facilitate the reintegration and reinvigoration of our conception of the relationship that exists between the historical, sacramental and ecclesial embodiments of Christ, and to do just to the past, present and future dimensions of the Eucharist.

I know that this might seem very dense and difficult to understand but I truly believe that it is important that we begin to think about what we do during the Divine Liturgy as a real and true encounter with Christ in the present moment so that we might have the courage to work to make God’s Kingdom real right now. We must remember, perhaps, that there is NO TIME in the spiritual dimension. For God and the spiritual dimension there is only the PRESENT MOMENT. I know that this is difficult for people to understand since we are so trapped in time and history. Remember, we only have a concept of time because our earth rotates around the sun and we have days and nights. (Its also funny that as we grow older, the idea of time becomes less important and seems to go faster or slower without any reference to the calendar or clock).

The concept of anamnesis helps us to understand the dynamics of retrospection and anticipation in the Church’s life, and the effects of encounter with the risen Christ in the present. The act of anamnesis looks back to a source event of the Church; through its present performance of that command the Church is formed in anticipation of the Lord’s coming again. The practice of Eucharistic anamnesis enables the Church to encounter the transformative fullness of the rise Christ with the result that that fullness is expressed in action and service.

 

Understanding Our Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church — 20160313

st ephraim the syrianI have been sharing thoughts about THE Lenten Prayer of the Eastern Church, that of Ephrem the Syrian. I have already shared thoughts about the first two parts of the prayer, namely the negative things that we must strive to eliminate in our lives and then the positive things that we must attempt to integrate into our lives. The concluding portion of the prayer then summarizes this effort by having us pray thus:

O Lord, grant me the grace to be aware of my sins and not to judge my brother, for You are blessed forever and ever. AMEN

This prayer teaches us that ultimately there is but one danger: PRIDE. Pride is the source of evil and all evil is pride. Yet it is not enough for us to see our own errors, for even this apparent virtue can be turned into pride.

Spiritual writings are full of warnings against subtle forms of piety which are not authentic. Piety can easily be subverted, under the guise of humility, to be pride. When we are able to see our own errors and not judge our brothers and sisters; when, in other terms, chastity, humility, patience and love are but one in us; then and only then can pride be truly destroyed within us.

This prayer, when taken in its entirety, is truly a guide for spiritual development. Spiritual development consists in eliminating those negative elements that can easily creep into human life but supplanting these negative elements with positive elements that can lead us to closer union with God. It is not enough to   just attempt to eliminate vices in our lives! The only way to truly eliminate vices is by supplanting them with certain virtues. It is not enough for us to know how not to act or what to do! We must know how to act and what to do – how to develop those behaviors that are supportive of spiritual growth. For example, it is not enough to tell someone not to hate their neighbor. More important is to show them how to love their neighbor. We must help one another learn how to be positive in a world that is, truly, quite negative. Again, it doesn’t just come naturally. We must develop the behaviors that support a positive way of living.

Hopefully all of my readers have obtained a copy of the Prayer of St. Ephrem. If you don’t have one, simply ask me and I can get you a copy. It is a very profound prayer that can help you to spiritually grow.

The Spirituality of the Christian East — 20160313

st_john_of_theladderI have been considering the 14th step on John’s Ladder, Gluttony. When we think about this step, we realize that gluttony considers high-quality food, or eating meat five days a week, to be something to which it is entitled. This passion of gluttony therefore distorts the balance e of the Church’s discipline of fasting and feasting in moderation. A gluttonous soul looks forward more to a banquet at Pascha than it does to the powerful life-shaping celebration of Christ’s Resurrection. It turns the church year into an endless cycle of gluttony and deprivation, binging and purging.

The Church’s tradition of fasting exists to restore balance between body and soul, between penitence and rejoicing, between us and the world around us. If fasting from food is, as the Eastern Church teaches, only the means to an end and not the end in itself, then so too feasting with food is only the means of enhancing our joy; it should not become the center of our celebration.

I think that this is a very important notion. Fasting is not an end unto itself. Fasting does not make God love us any more than He already does. Fasting is a discipline to help us come to a true recognition of God’s love for us. Unfortunately I think that many people have the wrong notion about fasting. God doesn’t need us to fast! It does not change His disposition to us in the least. Fasting is meant to help us change our understanding of the relationship we have with God.

St. John is therefore careful to endorse moderation in both feasting and fasting. Moderation is the key to any true spiritual development. We must always strive to seek the middle way. God doesn’t need us to become fanatics. He needs us to do those things that lead us to Him.

Learning Our Faith From the Greek Fathers of the Church — 20160313

john-chrysostomI have been attempting to share St. John Chrysostom’s thoughts about the Transfiguration. I would hasten to also point out that there are some scholars who believe that this event actually is actually a post-Resurrection event. It is an event that is plays an important role in the spirituality of our Eastern Church. This is one of the reasons why I have chosen to share the thoughts of our Fathers among the Saints about this topic. I realize that it can become rather pedantic, but I would encourage my readers to stick to reading about it.

As I suggested in the last issue, St. John felt that there would be a difference in the glory that humans would see at the Last Day and the glory that the apostles saw on Mt Tabor. St. John suggests that at the Last Day the manifestation of the full majesty of Christ’s heavenly status will be “the very glory of the Father”, that heavenly glory which is also proper to the pre-eternal and consubstantial Word of God. Thus, Chrysostom is not suggesting that the glory shown at the Transfiguration is qualitatively inferior to that of the Last Day, but that it is by comparison a humble foreshowing of that very same glory which will be unleashed at the Second Coming. In this, St. John’s position greatly resembles that of Irenaeus, who, when speaking of the glory of the Millennium and the final glory of the Kingdom of Heaven, makes no qualitative distinction and speaks of the same Paternal glory.

Thus Chrysostom does regard the Transfiguration as a genuine eschatological revelation, even though in terms of scale he does not see it as a perfect or accurate manifestation of the glory of the future Kingdom. Even the Light of Tabor, writes John, can only be but a dim image of the future things. For only at the Last Day shall we have a “face to face” vision of the Incarnate Word.

A THOUGHT. I am not sure whether you came to the same conclusion that I did when you read this. To me it made perfect sense. God, that is Father and Spirit, are invisible beings. Jesus, the Son, has a visible countenance because He, in time, had a human form. So the God we will behold in the spiritual dimension is Jesus in His glorified body. We cannot possibly   behold our Triune God but, because God was incarnate in the Person of the Son, we will be able to behold the Son in His glorified body.

I share this because I realize that people have all sorts of fantasies about the things of religion and the afterlife.

Reflections on the Scriptural Readings for this Weekend — 20160306

The exhortation the Church gives us this weekend is found in the theme that emerges from the two readings. The theme deals with the fullness of life (salvation) which is given to those who have faith and trust in God. This is quite evident in the Gospel which relates a story about the disciples being unable, when asked, to cast out a demon. Jesus, it would seem, expected that they would be able to cast out such demons. The reaction of Jesus seems to indicate that they were unable to do so because of their lack of faith and prayer.

As I look at it, this story is a continuation of the story we heard last week. That story’s theme is that faith is essential if we hope to have a relationship with God.

st_john_of_theladderThe idea of having faith in the goodness of God, I believe, is critical if we are to realize the meaning and purpose of this present life. I takes, however, an assessment of our idea of who God is in order to achieve such an understanding. Many people, I have found, never really spend time thinking about their idea of Who God is and what He is really like. They just seem to think that He thinks like they do, having the same kind attitudes about what is right and wrong and what is the truth. These attitudes are: punish wrong-doers; disregard those who do not believe in Jesus Christ; and reward those who do good. In other words, God thinks like them. He has the same ideas as they do about life and its meaning and purpose. I find that many people what to put God in a box of their creation. They definitely want to eliminate the mystery of Who He is so that they can always predict how He will react. They love living in a world that is black and white. They cannot tolerate a grey world, requiring them to live with faith and trust in God.

Throughout the New Testament we hear Jesus calling people to believe and trust in God. Our Eastern Christian faith repeatedly tells us to not attempt to define Who God is and how He works. Rather, it calls us to just stand in awe before the great mystery of a God Who loves humankind so very much that He actually took on human nature so that He might show us how to live in a world filled with real mysteries and challenges. Living with faith in the goodness of God without definite proof is truly the beginning of salvation. Why? Because it requires that we place our hope and trust in God.

We know one thing to be true. God unconditionally loves and forgives us and we can do nothing to alter His love for us.                 Alleluia!

Gaining a Deeper Understanding of the New Testament — 20160306

the_four_evangelistsFor the past several weeks I have been sharing with my readers what scholars think about the similarities and dissimilarities found in the three Synoptic Gospels. I shared the first theory, Oral Tradition, which suggests that differences are due to various oral traditions. The second theory,   Literary Interdependence, puts forth two possibilities, namely that Mark’s Gospel is the source for both Matthew and Luke’s Gospels OR that Matthew is the literary source for the other two Gospels. In the last issue I began sharing yet another theory, namely hypotheses about some one other document being the source of all the Gospels. The first example of this theory is that a single document is the basis for a three-fold tradition. The next theory in this category is that a complementary document is the basis for a twofold tradition. This theory attempts to explain the origin of the material common only to Matthew and Luke. It is called the Two-Document Theory.

This hypothesis holds wide acceptance among Protestants and, in a modified form, among Catholics as well. Despite Matthew’s and Luke’s independence of each other, there are agreements in opposition to Mark that seem to call for a Greek source prior to Mark. This Greek source, whose existence is pure conjecture, consisted almost entirely of words or sayings of Jesus. The two later Synoptics, namely Luke and Matthew, would have drawn the greater part of their material from this source plus Mark, adapting the material to the different circles they wishes to reach. It ought to be kept in mind that those who would identify this “Q” document with Aram Matthew “M” or its Greek form “Mg”, in order to defend the “traditional” sequence giving Matthew priority, are thought to do so arbitrarily.

This two-document theory has become very complex through numerous versions and modifications. One of its great unsolved problems is that the phenomena positing the existence of “Q” appear not only in the sayings sections but also in the narrative sections. The “Q” material has always been considered a Greek collection of sayings, not a true narrative. Moreover this classical theory does not take into account oral tradition. The Gospels could not have arisen solely as a writing process.

It is my hope that sharing these various ideas about the Gospels will give my readers a greater appreciation of our Sacred Literature. The Gospels, although based on history, are not historical documents. They are documents written to promote faith.

 

The Divine Liturgy and Our Worship of God — 20160306

Holy Eucharist IconEucharistic anamnesis is not a mere spectacle; nor is it a mysterious phenomenon to be wondered at. It is participatory. However, discussion of the Eucharist has been, and continues to be, a focus of controversy with regard to both theology and practice, becoming a sign of pain and division. Indeed, the Churches’ understanding of anamnesis has not been without problems, with interpretations ranging from notions of re-immolation to bare memorialism, in which different kinds of objective and subjective realities have been prioritized. These extreme views are neither adequate nor accurate. The concept of anamnesis has, I believe, the potential to help us grow in our faith and our sense of Christianity.

I would like to point out that when a Church, such as our Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church, is in union with – communion with – another Church, such as the Roman Catholic Church, it only means that we can celebrate the Eucharist together and recognize that our Churches have a common faith. This does not mean, however, that we have a common theology, be it dogmatic or liturgical. I have found, after fifty some years as a priest, that frequently people believe that if you call yourself Catholic and are in union with the Roman Church that you have to embrace the same interpretation of the basic beliefs they hold. The whole Church has always had different approaches to its understanding of the foundational dogmas formulated during the first seven Ecumenical Councils. It should be understood that the Catholic Church is, in actuality, a communion of Churches, each of which has its own, albeit similar, liturgical practices and theology. Our understanding of these and our interpretation of these, may, while different, be equally correct.

To return to the idea of anamnesis. It is an important concept in any discussion of the Eucharist. The       sacramental act of anamnesis draws the Church into a transformative encounter with the risen Christ in the present. When Jesus shared with His disciples that He would be with them for all time, He made that possible through the Eucharist. For in the Eucharist He is with us in His Body and Blood – in His Person. It is only for us to begin to become aware of His presence with us.

CALLED TO HOLINESS — 20160306

theotokosThe call to holiness is a call to a spiritual revolution in our minds – a way for the Spirit of God to change   entirely the ways in which we think, feel, imagine, decide and remember. I would hasten to remind my readers that, despite the fact that it is a human trait to resist change, we are called to embrace change. The call to holiness is a call to change.

Who or what could take over our minds and entirely revolutionize them? Surely humanistic psychology cannot do it. Powerful and important as it is when it is used properly (in relationship to God), psychology ultimately relies on one set of thoughts and feelings to replace another, and that is not the spiritual revolution and renewal of the person that God calls us to be. Surely religious and/or secular cults cannot do it for they are either an irresponsible variant of humanistic psychology or they put people in touch with a spiritual power that is not good, holy, and true – for not all spirits are good spirits, and not all spirits are looking out for our welfare.

Only Jesus has the power that we seek. Only Jesus can revolutionize our minds “in God’s way, in the goodness and holiness of truth”.

I have found, after fifty years of being a priest and studying psychology, that the two disciplines, when used in combination, can truly help a person to accomplish the revolution of mind and heart that the call to holiness envisions. Psychology can help people heal the old memories that can keep a person from freely embracing the idea of personal transformation/change (Metanoia). I agree, however, that by itself it can only heal psychic pain. Engaging in activities designed to support spiritual growth must be integrated into this process in order for people to achieve the goal of coming to a deeper understanding of the meaning and purpose of life and actualizing their potential to be like Jesus.

Typical of Jesus, His form of revolution is both gentle and strong. He does not want to bulldoze His way into our lives. He respects our free will!

Making the Great Fast Real

This week look at your behaviors and determine how many times you engage in these behaviors. Then, try to decrease the negative behaviors and increase the positive ones.

  • Fast from anger;
    Feast on patience.
  • Fast from pessimism;
    Feast on optimism.
  • Fast from negatives;
    Feast on affirmatives.

Actually count the times you engage in each behavior. The goal: increase the positive; eliminate the negative.

 

Understanding Our Ukrainian Greek-Catholic Church — 20160306

In last week’s Bulletin I began sharing thoughts about the Prayer of Ephrem, which is THE Lenten Him of the Eastern Church. In the first verse of the prayer, we deal with the four negative “objects” of metanoia. They are the objects to be removed. But God alone can remove them. Hence, the first part of this prayer must be a cry from the bottom of our human helplessness. We must sense, by the way, that we are truly helpless to grow in our likeness of Jesus without God’s help.

st ephraim the syrianThe prayer then moves to the four positive aims of metanoia. The first identified is chastity. We must not reduce the meaning of chastity to only sexual behavior. Chastity is meant to be the positive counterpart of sloth. Truly a better definition for chastity in this case is whole-mindedness. Sloth is, first of all, dissipation, the brokenness of our vision and energy, the inability to see the whole. Its opposite then is precisely wholeness. It has been clearly connected to sexual behavior because frequently we humans, when engaged in sexual activities, forget the bigger picture which is WHY God has made us sexual beings.

The second object of metanoia that we are called to developed is the virtue of humility. Humility is the       ability to truly see ourselves as God sees us and to accept the fact that God created us as we are because He knows that the combination of strengths and weaknesses which each one of us has are absolutely right to help us spiritually grow.

It seems that if we develop both chastity and humility the next virtue begins to develop, namely the       virtue of patience. We frequently fail to see that patience is something that must be developed. It does not come to us naturally. When we come to truly understand the meaning and purpose of life, we become patient. It seems to be true, as we examine the lives of the saints, that the closer we come to God the more patient we become.

The final characteristic we are called to develop is unconditional love. We have, because God’s Spirit dwells within us, the potential to be able to unconditionally love others as God loves us. It is all a matter of beginning to think and act like Jesus. This, of course, is why we have been called to embrace the Way of Jesus. His way is a way that reflects whole-mindedness, humility, patience and love. His way is a way that truly understands the meaning and purpose of earthly life.